DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JET
Docket No. NR3245-13
24 Mar 14
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on: 24 March 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, |
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinions furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 of 19 Jun
13 and CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 of 31 Oct 13, a copies of which
are attached, and were previously provided. The Board also
considered your response dated 1 October 2013 to the advisory
opinion dated 19 June 2013.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
advisory opinions. The Board took into consideration that once
you completed and signed the Montgomery GI Bill Act of 1984
(MGIB) form on 2 May 2006 to sign up for the “buy-up” program,
you neglected to ensure that the required payments were taken
out as it was your responsibility to do. Furthermore, you have
provided no proof that you were misinformed that the deduction
would be automatically deducted once you completed the form.”
Bocket No. NR3245-13
Under these circumstances, the Board found that no relief is
warranted. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
_material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
_ existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
TS AD . (An
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director.
Enclosure: 1. CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 of 19 Jun 13
2. CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 of 31 Oct 13
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2575-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, reguiations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 25 Jun 13, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3274-13
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 27 Jun 13, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3209-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 atd 21 Jun 13, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR773 14
Members who are retired are not ¢€ the benefits. Because my retirement date followed 50 closely behind the 1 memo (2270un2002) , the memo was release of the Post 9/11 GI Bil not well known at my command and key points of the memo were not ement.” However, the Board disseminated to me before my retir formation about the Post-9/11 found that whether as you claim in GI Bill was not disseminated to you or the command before your retirement, information about the Post-9/1i GI Billi has...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05413-12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 20 Jun 12, a copy of which is attached. ‘Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6423 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.. New evidence is evidence’ not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2084-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ‘of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 2 May 13, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4117 13
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 17 Sep 13, a copy of which is attached. Members who are retired are not eligible to transfer such benefits. Had you followed up on your application after it was rejected in October 2009, you would have been able to complete any actions necessary to effect the transfer of benefits.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0744-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 19 Apr 13, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No, NR744-13 naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the | existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 02471-12
5471-12 21 Mar 13 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted _of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...